SPRINKLER RETROFITS
SAVE LIVES

Here are the facts

Dispelling myths and making sense of SF’s high-rise sprinkler retrofit law

  • Retrofits are outrageously expensive and impossible for condo owners to afford.

    FACT:

    Actual retrofit costs — based on completed projects, national data, and SF’s own 2016 legislative analysis — are far lower than the inflated estimates circulated by opponents.

    More facts:

    • Cities like Philadelphia, Honolulu, and San Jose have completed large-scale retrofits at predictable, manageable costs.

    • Financing can be spread over many years.

    • Retrofits increase property resilience, reduce insurance risk, and stabilize long-term value.

    • The cost of a single high-rise fire can exceed the cost of retrofitting an entire building.

    • Sprinklers are one of the highest-value, lowest-cost safety upgrades available.

  • Sprinkler retrofits will displace residents, forcing people from their homes.

    FACT:

    Modern sprinkler retrofits are routinely completed with residents in place.

    More facts:

    • Union-signatory contractors regularly retrofit occupied high-rise buildings using:

      • Flexible piping systems,

      • Minimal-intrusion ceiling drops,

      • Unit-by-unit scheduling, and

      • Short in-unit work windows (often a few hours at a time).

    • Thousands of buildings nationwide have been retrofitted without displacement, including condos, hotels, offices, and mixed-use towers.

    • San Francisco’s 12-year compliance timeline further minimizes any disruption.

  • High-rise fires are rare, so sprinklers aren’t necessary.

    FACT:

    High-rise fires have higher fatality, injury, and property-loss risks than fires in lower buildings.

    More facts:

    • During high-rise fires, flames spread vertically and stairwells fill with smoke, making evacuation far more dangerous.

    • National fire data shows that sprinklers:

      • Reduce fire deaths by 80% to 90%,

      • Reduce firefighter injuries,

      • Stop fires from spreading beyond the room of origin, and

      • Prevent catastrophic losses that displace hundreds of residents.

    • The risk is real — and sprinklers are the proven solution.

  • San Francisco is doing something extreme that other cities don’t require.

    FACT:

    Dozens of U.S. jurisdictions have retroactive sprinkler laws, including major cities and entire states.

    More facts:

    • Places where retroactive sprinkler laws have been successfully carried out include:

      • Atlanta,

      • Honolulu,

      • Los Angeles,

      • Louisville,

      • Philadelphia,

      • San Antonio, and

      • San Jose.

    • San Francisco’s 12-year timeline is moderate and mainstream compared to these cities.

  • There are cheaper or equivalent alternatives to sprinklers.

    FACT:

    No alternative offers the
    life-saving impact of sprinklers.

    More facts:

    • According to fire experts and national code organizations — including NFPA, ICC, and the National Fire Sprinkler Association:

      • Sprinklers are the most effective and reliable fire-safety system ever developed.

      • Alarm systems, stairwell pressurization, and compartmentation are valuable, but they do not extinguish a fire. Only sprinklers do.

  • Buildings that survived this long don’t need upgrades now.

    FACT:

    Fire conditions today — more synthetic materials, faster-burning furniture, higher occupancy — mean fires can reach flashover in under five minutes, creating a dangerous scenario in a non-sprinklered tower.

    More facts:

    • Older high-rises often lack:

      • Fire-resistant construction,

      • Modern detection systems,

      • Controlled exit paths,

      • Adequate smoke protection, and

      • Reliable water supply systems.

    • Upgrading life-safety systems in older buildings is responsible, overdue, and essential.

  • The City should delay or weaken the law to study the issue further.

    FACT:

    This law was already built on extensive analysis.

    More facts:

    • All of the following went into the development of San Francisco’s sprinkler retrofit ordinance:

      • A full legislative report by the Budget and Legislative Analyst,

      • National fire-safety research, and

      • Input from firefighters, engineers, and safety experts.

    • A long implementation runway already exists.

    • Delaying now serves only the narrow interests of a few well-funded condo associations — not citywide public safety.

FIRE SAFETY MEANS SPRINKLER RETROFITS •

FIRE SAFETY MEANS SPRINKLER RETROFITS •

Sprinklers save lives

Watch TK TK TK

WATCH MORE ADVOCATES

Does my building need a retrofit?

The SF fire department has identified ### high-rise residential buildings built before 1974 that must comply with the sprinkler retrofit ordinance (#377-93) passed in 1993.

Learn more